Minolta manual focus SLR system
home up galleries articles links contact

 

I use the following Minolta manual focus bodies:

Minolta XD7 since 1977 
Minolta XD5 since 1980
Minolta XE5, XE, XK
Minolta SRT101/SRT303

Minolta XD 7 with a cult classic lens mounted.
 Minolta MD Rokkor 50mm 1:1.7 55mm filter thread. 
It is a well balanced lens that in summary has not a single disadvantage.
The german magazin "test" in all criteria gave this lens a very good, 
the best possible classification! 

 

My Minolta XD 5 with another cult classic lens mounted.
 Minolta MD W.Rokkor 24mm 1:2.8 55mm filter thread and six rubber rows. 
The lens set was also sold under the Leica label und rumors go that 
this lens finally convinced Leitz to take Minolta for their partnership.
A tag sharp lens from center to edge and a very big recommondation to get it.
Some lens tests tested nearly 150 linepairs/mm for this lens.

 

My Minolta XE 5 with my favorite normal prime lens mounted.
 Minolta MC Rokkor-X PG 1:1.4 50mm with four rubber rows. 
The lens is the sharpest beast at 5.6 and 8 I ever found for 35mm film cameras.
Some lens tests in the 1970ies tested more than 150 linepairs/mm for this lens,
I have no doubt!

 

My Minolta SRT101/303 body. 
It is technically a SRT 101 but I later replaced the top because of a deep scratch. 
I bought it in the 1980ies very cheap together with the following top performing lens. 

MC Rokkor-PF 1:2 50mm 55mm filter thread and two rubber rows. 
There were rumors that this lens in some ways has similarity 
with some versions of the Leica Summicron. 
 I cannot confirm this statement, but the optical performance 
of this lens is simply outstanding. 
The only slight disadvantage I have found, 
was a (very) little bit more light fall off at apertures 2 and 2.8.

All these bodies work without any problem since today. Because of the battery problem with the SRT's I use it without battery and therefore without internal light metering.

It's not a problem for me, because I can use my Gossen light meter.

The real thing that holds my by the line are the old Rokkor lenses. They are really jewels! My Grandpa used to say: 

"The lens takes the picture"

In my photographic carreer I tried hard to find any better 35mm SLR system but till now nothing beats the old Rokkors I use. In the beginning of the 1970ies Minolta has reached a calculation and production standard for lenses that even Leitz takes over some of the known well performing optical units from Minolta in there lens line.

Here are my current Minolta (mostly Rokkor) lenses each followed by my short personal opinion:

MC W.ROKKOR-NL  1:2.8 f=21mm
the newest item in my collection view some pictures in my Minolta mf gallery 
 

MD W.Rokkor 24mm 1:2.8
floating focusing, and very good performance at f8 from close to infinity, very good contrast too
 

MC W.Rokkor-HH 1:1.8 f=35mm
a wonderful havy lens with outstanding mechanical built quality, now my favorite 35mm lens, very good wide open and very good contrast too. I also own a second example of this lens in old full metal construction wich is equally sharp but shows minimal less contrast. Its a wonderful lens too...
  
MD W.Rokkor 35mm 1:1.8
a compact 1.8 35mm lens but I now prefere my MC
  
MD W.Rokkor 35mm 1:2.8
a very, very good compact 35mm 2.8 lens but I prefere the 1.8
  
MC Rokkor 1:2.8 35mm 
a lens with wonderful mechanical built quality, optically nearly on par with my 1.8 35mm and has the prefered 55mm filter thread
 
MD Rokkor 1:2 45mm
nearly unused, I don't like this lens, it feels cheap built to me not on the same level as my other Rokkors, optically its a full usable good lens, but it stayes slightly visible behind the best other 50mm Rokkors
 
MC Rokkor-X PG 1:1.4 50mm 
my favorite normal prime lens, razor sharp at 5.6 and 8, especially at apertures up to 5.6 clear visible better than my MD Rokkor 1:1.4 50mm
 
MD Rokkor 1:1.4 50mm 55mm filter thread 
since I got the MC 1.4 a seldom used lens, but may be due to the fact that the MC is such a exeptional lens!
 
MC Rokkor-PF 1:1.7 50mm
used seldom, but when used picture quality was outstanding too 
 
MD Rokkor 1:1.7 50mm (first MD Rokkor version with 55mm fiter thread)
also a exceptional good lens, at f2.8 and f4 it even beats the 1.4 Rokkors, has very little distortion too, and very good flare resistance due to the recessed front lens
 
MC Rokkor 1:2 50mm 
I own two examples, in optical performance both are equal and very very sharp too, nearly comparable to my MC 1.4
 
MD Rokkor 1:2 50mm 
This lens is very good, but the coating seems cheaper to me compared to the earlier MC Rokkor PF 1:2 50mm. And also my photographic results show very, very slightly less contrast. So I prefer the older MC Version. Lens elements itself seem to me to be unchanged.
 
MD Macro 1:3.5 50mm 
for close ups a optically really unbeatable sharp lens!
at infinity shots slightly visible behind the best other Minolta 50mm primes
one of the seldom examples for a plain MD lens where built quality is nearly comparable to the old MC Rokkor version 
  
MC Rokkor 1:1.2 58mm
My favorite universal normal lens by far. Wonderful class leading bokeh and very, very sharp too. It is for practical usage equal as sharp as the best other 50mm lenses. Wonderful pictures at f2.8 and I have Pete Ganzels Adapter to mount it on my Minolta AF and Sony DSLR Systems too. Its really worth it, trust me!
 
MC Rokkor 1:1.7 85mm
A focal length I absolutly love, and this is my favorite 85mm, sharpness, contrast, bokeh all outstanding - the best portrait lens at f2.8 of my line, sure a lens I don't want to live without!
 
MD Rokkor 85mm  1:2
Sharpness, contrast all outstanding at f5.6, very sharp even wide open but bokeh stays slightly behind the MC 1.7, a lens I will never sell because it is equal sharp up to the corners.
 
MC Tele Rokkor 1:2.5 100mm 
a well built perfect lens, very sharp even wide open. But competion is hard in that focal length and I personally prefer my 85mm Rokkors.  For close distance shots my MD Macro Rokkor 1:4 100mm is simply unbeatable and so my usage of this lens is not close to what it deserves.
 
MD Macro Rokkor 1:4 100mm 
a superb sharp lens at f8 and f11 a Macro lens near perfection IMHO. It even outperforms the high rated Tamron SP 2.8 90mm by a slight margin.
As with the 50mm Macro the performance decreases very slightly for infinity shots.
 
MC Rokkor PF 1:2.8 135mm (the six element version)
clear my bokeh champion in the 135mm league, not completly as sharp as the MD Rokkor 135mm 1:2.8 but still very good and a wonderful creamy lens when used wide open
 
MD Rokkor 135mm 1:2.8 (the havy four element version)
Beats the MC 135mm concerning sharpness and contrast; concerning bokeh I think the MC has the advantage, but this is another point to be examined in more detail.
 
MD Rokkor 1:4 200mm 
Seldom used, if I need this focal lenght I most often go with my MD Zooms 1:4.5 75-200mm or 1:4 70-210mm which are very good too from medium (120mm) up to the long zoom end.
  
MC Rokkor 1:4.5 300mm 
A wonderful built lens I use seldom and therefore I too got a Kiron MC7 2xTC and a Minolta 2xTC to get 600mm focal length. It has a good reputation too, but I havn't used this lens enough till now to make any statements. On my Sony Alpha APS-C mounted with a lensless adapter it gave very good results.
 
MD Zoom Rokkor 1:3.5 35-70mm
Seldom used too, but only because I love my primes so much, the lens clear deserves much more usage. Once I compared it again many 50mm primes and it clear outresolves the older Tessar Designs from Eastern Germany and Yashica Japan and therefore deserves its very good reputation in the range from 35 to 55mm, at the long end you'd better stop down to f8 to keep contrast and resolution high
 
MC Zoom Rokkor 1:4.5 80-200mm 
Not much used till now, but a very nice lens and the first Tele Zoom of the Minolta/Leica co-operation. I think outperformed by the two newer designs.
 
MD Zoom 1:4.5 75-200mm 
Very good performance from medium to long zoom range, where many zooms of this range degrade in contrast.
At short range I prefer to use my primes, because they outperform the zoom lenses here and I prefer their lightweight handling too.
 
MD Zoom 1:4 70-210mm 
Now my favorite Tele Zoom. Its the third and last of the Minolta/Leica co-operation Tele Zooms; 
My findings are: It ist equal as sharp as my 75-200 but wider. I compared all the three legendary Minolta Tele Zooms against my Tokina 4/80-200mm and this is my winner. I also own this lens design in a "beercan" for my Minolta/Sony AF-System 
 


Minolta MC W.Rokkor 1:2.8 f=35mm 55mm filter thread. A very good performer.
 But now I prefer my MC W.ROKKOR-HH 1:1.8 f=35mm. 
Also my Minolta MD W.Rokkor 35mm 1:2.8 49mm filter thread
is a very, very good performer concerning sharpness.

 

 My MD Macro f=50mm 1:3.5 the next cult classic lens in the Minolta line. 
Here full extended with its life size adapter mounted 
that lets you take pictures up to scale 1:1 (=life size).
This lens is corrected to have zero distortion and for distances closer aproximatly 5m 
the sharpest lens you can imagine. 
I found it to have a little bit more than 50mm focal length ca. 52mm

 

My loved Minolta MD Macro Rokkor 100mm 1:4
showing havy usage through the last 25 years,
but optical it delivers a picture quality like new!
This lens in the 1980ies beats in the high rated color foto 
"Praxis test" from Walter E. Schön all competitors 
including Leitz, Zeiss, Olympus, Canon and Nikon.
I know why! No doubt a real jewel!

 

A Zoom I often use is the Minolta MD 75-200 1:4.5.
Its optical identical to the older MD Rokkor version and also was 
sold by Leitz as Leica Vario-Elmar-R 4.5/75-200mm. Its a focal range, where
construction of optical high quality lenses seems to be possible to me. 

And Minolta did it very well and fortunately the otherwise so often usual
 optical degration due to cost reduction was omitted in the case of this lens!
The new MD version here has the advantage of the quick snap in lens hood that, 
could be snaped in, in reverse direction for transportation sake.

 

A zoom I have seldom used is the Minolta Zoom Rokkor 35-70mm 1:3.5.
It also was sold by Leitz under the Leica label as 
Leica Vario-Elmar-R 3.5/35-70mm and also was a test winner!
The optical quality from low to medium zoom range is very good, 
at the upper end you should better stop down the aperture to 5.6 or 8. 
But I prefered the best primes because they performed even slightly better. 
The lens hood is mounted on the outer thread, wheras filters are mounted
 at the inner thread, a unusual and uncomfortable method I think.

I got it as Kit lens bundled with my XD5 1980. What a great difference, 
those days minolta bundled such high performance lenses with a body,
compared against those chunk lenses 28-80mm or 28-100mm these days.  

 

I sometimes use a

RMC Tokina 1:4 80-200mm

too, which at the short zoom range 80-120mm performs very good in center and is smaller and not so havy as the Minolta MD 75-200mm. Color rendition is a little bit colder and thats why it has to be regarded for color slide shooting. Therefore I ordered the Minolta MD 75-200mm zoom lens later, because it better fits into the Minolta line! 

My personal favorites and most used lenses in the Minolta manual focus line and my big recommendation for every Minolta manual focus user are:

MD W.Rokkor 24mm 1:2.8 
a ingenious lens tag sharp from edge to edge and no visible light falloff at f8 the f-stop I like most for this lens
 
MD Macro 50mm 1:3.5 
superb sharp for close distances, necessary especially if you don't have the 100mm Macro
 
MC Rokkor-X PG 50mm 1:1.4 
the best 1.4 50mm "normal" lens ever! I like f5.6 with this lens most.
 
MC Rokkor-X 1:1.2 58mm  
the universal "normal" lens with the best bokeh ever! I like f2.8 with this lens most.
 
MC Rokkor 1:1.7 85mm 
a wonderful portrait and object photography lens! I like f2.8 to f5.6 with this lens most, but if I want to have wonderful bokeh (blured background) I use f2.8 with very good results
   
MD Macro Rokkor 100mm 1:4 
a lens delivering fantastic contrasty and sharp pictures! simply a perfect Macro lens for a 35mm system at f8 IMHO!
 
MD Rokkor 135mm 1:2.8 (the four element version!)
Razor sharp stopped down to 5.6 and good sharpness even wide open; one of the best 135mm lenses in the world;
only the much larger and havier Leica R 135mm 2.8 beats this Minolta Jewel by a really minimum (nearly unvisible) amount
 
These lenses in many tests have shown that they are "world class". They provide picture quality on the same level and somtimes even outperform the best lenses from the Leica R-System and the Carl Zeiss Contax-System.